Kurt Roeckx (30/12/2010):
> Do you know about parallel in moreutils? Is there an advantage over
> that one?
The bug log answers the former (yes). The 4 options mentioned in
moreutils's manpage seem to have an equivalent in GNU parallel,
according to the first link under “Documentation”.
KiBi.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:28:16PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Time has passed and parallel became a GNU project:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
>
> I guess packaging it can be reconsidered?
Do you know about parallel in moreutils? Is there an advantage
over that one?
On 29/12/10 15:28 -0600, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Time has passed and parallel became a GNU project:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I guess packaging it can be reconsidered?
Samuel
I've been working on a package for parallel, but I'm a newbie
maintainer so it'll probably turn
Hello,
Time has passed and parallel became a GNU project:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I guess packaging it can be reconsidered?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
I just noticed moreutils version 0.36 now contains a parallel command
too. I haven't tested it yet.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Ole Tange, le Wed 11 Mar 2009 17:05:34 +0100, a écrit :
>> One of friends alerted me to your discussion of 'parallel' and whether
>> other tools can replace it.
>
> The question could also be rephrased: can't we just extended xargs into
> s
Ole Tange, le Wed 11 Mar 2009 17:05:34 +0100, a écrit :
> One of friends alerted me to your discussion of 'parallel' and whether
> other tools can replace it.
The question could also be rephrased: can't we just extended xargs into
supporting what parallel does? Having two separate tools will alwa
One of friends alerted me to your discussion of 'parallel' and whether
other tools can replace it. Here are some good examples to try to
reproduce without 'parallel':
$ ls | grep abc | parallel gzip -c >/tmp/file.gz
Try this in a dir with 1000 50 kB sized mixed files with file names
that include
Phil's in hospital. Will reply towards end of week.
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:57:57PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I thought at first "it's not particularly convenient", then "well, so
> > what". Now I'm thinking "Mmm, but people won't know
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:57:57PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I thought at first "it's not particularly convenient", then "well, so
> what". Now I'm thinking "Mmm, but people won't know they should do it
> and blame xargs for being broken". Also annotate-output is not enough
> when programs
Samuel Thibault (09/03/2009):
> which makes parallel not take a command, but executes commands from
> stdin. That can however be obtained by xargs sh -c. Another option
> that xargs misses is
>
>-j +NAdd N to the number of CPUs. Run this many jobs in parallel.
> For
Chuan-kai Lin, le Mon 09 Mar 2009 12:46:35 -0700, a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:40:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > A lot of applications (including md5sum) would not necessarily print
> > their output atomically and then you get mixed output. Either we add
> > the option to finduti
Chuan-kai Lin, le Mon 09 Mar 2009 12:46:35 -0700, a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:40:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > A lot of applications (including md5sum) would not necessarily print
> > their output atomically and then you get mixed output. Either we add
> > the option to finduti
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:40:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> A lot of applications (including md5sum) would not necessarily print
> their output atomically and then you get mixed output. Either we add
> the option to findutils, or we package parallel.
It appears to me that you can get the s
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Andreas Rottmann, le Mon 09 Mar 2009 11:25:11 +0100, a écrit :
>> Did you know about the `-P' option of GNU xargs?
>
> Herm, I would have found it if the manpage didn't lack keywords like
> "parallel", "simultaneous", ... Reassigning.
>
> That being said, I guess xargs l
clone 518696 -1
reassign -1 findutils
retitle -1 Add "parallel" somewhere in the description of -P
thanks
Andreas Rottmann, le Mon 09 Mar 2009 11:25:11 +0100, a écrit :
> Did you know about the `-P' option of GNU xargs?
Herm, I would have found it if the manpage didn't lack keywords like
"paralle
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2009-03-08
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: parallel
> Version : 20090218
> Upstream Author : Ole Tange
> * URL : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/parallel/
> * License : GPLv3
> Des
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2009-03-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: parallel
Version : 20090218
Upstream Author : Ole Tange
* URL : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/parallel/
* License : GPLv3
Description : build and execute command line
18 matches
Mail list logo
