Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-24 Thread Andreas Barth
* Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050324 00:35]: On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being supported by Debian assets, such that the FSF documentation were no longer available, I'd probably

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-23 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:24:41PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: The Vancouver meeting summary upset me, not because of the proposals to drop architectures, but because it contained a reminder of the Social Contract changes. The project is moving to what I believe to be a ridiculously

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-23 Thread Russell Coker
On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being supported by Debian assets, such that the FSF documentation were no longer available, I'd probably end up agreeing with you and probably would do what

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Anyway, regarding kernels: I can imagine sometimes, especially with the backlog we have currently, a swift processing of some kernel package might be warranted and

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Matthew Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 17:05]: I'm not going to volunteer for them as I intend to leave Debian shortly after sarge releases. Why do you intend to leave Debian? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:45:10PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Thanks. Maybe i should resign from my debian duties then since i am not wanted. Do you volunteer to take over my packages ? Please handle parted for which i am

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-21 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Thanks. Maybe i should resign from my debian duties then since i am not wanted. Do you volunteer to take over my packages ? Please handle parted for which i am searching a co-maintainer since 6 month, and take over the powerpc

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

2005-03-21 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Matthew Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 17:05]: I'm not going to volunteer for them as I intend to leave Debian shortly after sarge releases. Why do you intend to leave Debian? The Vancouver meeting summary upset me, not