Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a pdf file is huge because of
> lack of internal compression then isn't it better to use a tool that
> compresses internally than to fix the symptoms?
The internal compression allowed in a PDF file is dictated by the PDF
specification. This open sta
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:46, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/06/2006 (05:08) :
> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:51 -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> > > > I have no idea how debhelper works. Are there anybody out there
> > > > that can help with getting it to stop
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/06/2006 (12:17) :
> I think I gave wrong impression to you.
Yes :-)
I thought you meant the usual: OK I'll fix your problem if you provide
the solution :-)
> Most of PDF.GZ are under me and tetex-doc people. Once we find good
> technical solution, we m
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/06/2006 (05:08) :
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:51 -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
>
> > > I have no idea how debhelper works. Are there anybody out there that
> > > can help with getting it to stop gzipping files in -doc?
> >
> > dh_compress already ha
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:51 -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> > I have no idea how debhelper works. Are there anybody out there that
> > can help with getting it to stop gzipping files in -doc?
>
> dh_compress already has a list of file extensions where (re-)compressing
> doesn't make sense.
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If anyone wants this to be fixed following should happen.
> >
> > * Write a patch to the debhelper gzip text/pdf/ps file logic
> >- do not compress if the package is *-doc and file extension is
>
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:30:34AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:35:53 +0900
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > * propose policy update proposal. (debian-policy)
>
> Ok, I'll bring it up here.
>
> > Unless someone do the first work, nothing will change. It is
#include
* Osamu Aoki [Sat, Jun 24 2006, 08:35:53PM]:
> > If one really really need to gzip, then make all applications in the
> > default Debian system able to handle gzipped files so there is no need
> > to unzip them to your local area and in fact use more space than
> > needed.
>
> The poin
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:35:53 +0900
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For architecture: all *-doc packages, there is no technical and
> practical reason to gzip *.pdf file. I agree. packages are gziped so
> package size d nt change. We do it just because of policy and bcause
> helper scrip
On Saturday 24 June 2006 14:35, Osamu Aoki wrote:
--cut--
> For architecture: all *-doc packages, there is no technical and
> practical reason to gzip *.pdf file. I agree. packages are gziped so
> package size d nt change. We do it just because of policy and bcause
> helper script is written suc
Hi relax.
As I said, I "understand ..". See below :)
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:52:26 +0900
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > But, we have fast CPUs so it is not too bad. Under gnome, fileroller
> > will open it for y
11 matches
Mail list logo
