Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-04-02 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 10:14:47AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:43:19PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: > > > > The ballots came from: > > > > > > 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active > > > developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:40:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Okay, 62.43% isn't so bad, but it doesn't really take that much effort to > vote in Debian, IMHO. You've just got to decide how to vote first. -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http:/

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-04-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:43:19PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: > > > The ballots came from: > > > > 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active > > developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... > > Wouldn't this be more properly FUD? > > :) What? --

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-03-31 Thread Seth R Arnold
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000331 12:23]: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: > > The ballots came from: > > 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active > developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... Wouldn't this be

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-03-31 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:06:19PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active > > developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... > > It think it just clearly shows typical lack of election interest. FYI, > Echelon has con

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-03-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active > developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... It think it just clearly shows typical lack of election interest. FYI, Echelon has confirmed a total of 346 developers

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-03-31 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: >> The ballots came from: > >216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active >developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al...

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

2000-03-31 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: > The ballots came from: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... > N: Marco D > N: Rapha > N: Stig Mathis These names are incorrect (perhaps