[Fwd: Re: [DNG] FW: support for merged /usr in Debian]

2016-01-03 Thread Svante Signell
Hi,  This message was not intended to be sent to a debian-* mailing list by the author. However, since it is (in my opinion) of large interest I got the permission to forward it to debian-devel. Hopefully, also some of the debian-devel subscribers will appreciate it too. Thanks! Forwarde

Re: [Fwd: Re: [DNG] FW: support for merged /usr in Debian]

2016-01-03 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2016-01-03 15:59:37, Svante Signell wrote: > Hi,  > > This message was not intended to be sent to a debian-* mailing list by > the author. However, since it is (in my opinion) of large interest I > got the permission to forward it to debian-devel. Hopefully, also some > of the debian-devel subs

Re: [Fwd: Re: [DNG] FW: support for merged /usr in Debian]

2016-01-03 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 04:08:53PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2016-01-03 15:59:37, Svante Signell wrote: > > Hi,  > > > > This message was not intended to be sent to a debian-* mailing list by > > the author. However, since it is (in my opinion) of large interest I > > got the permission to

Re: [Fwd: Re: [DNG] FW: support for merged /usr in Debian]

2016-01-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 03:59:37PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > This message was not intended to be sent to a debian-* mailing list by > the author. However, since it is (in my opinion) of large interest I > got the permission to forward it to debian-devel. Hopefully, also some > of the debian-de

Re: [Fwd: Re: [DNG] FW: support for merged /usr in Debian]

2016-01-03 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:08:53 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: >Wow, here I was thinking this would be some informed oppinion, but: > >"Oh, there are tools with which you can periscope into >initramfs, but have you ever really looked at everything in an >initramfs." > >Wait, what? Yes, I have many times unp