Em Dom, 2006-04-23 às 01:37 +0200, Kurt Roeckx escreveu:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The currently library seems to be libgtkdatabox-0.2.4.so.7.0.0
> and has an soname of libgtkdatabox-0.2.4.so.7. I guess the the
> new one will have something like libgtkdatab
Scripsit Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0.
[...]
> My guess is that there is an ABI change involved and thus I have to
> rename the package to libgtkdatabox-0.5.2.0-X . My question is:
> What is the right choice for 'X' if I skipped several upstrea
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
> was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
> personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
> asked to package the latest ve
Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
>> was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
>> personal reasons to stay with an outdated version.
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the late
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the latest version and the library is probably
not important enough to keep different v
6 matches
Mail list logo
