On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 04:06:35AM +0930, Ron wrote:
The start of this thread is vague in my memory now, so apologies if I'm
off target here, but I would object to any sort of enforced kernel version
dependancy on a package.
Just because I have the 'correct' kernel version for a package
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron) writes:
I tend to use make-kpkg if I'm building a kernel to use on a different
machine than the one I'm building it on, but otherwise I usually dont.
Kernel packages are handy if you wish to intstall the same kernel image
on multiple machines, but since all my machines
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 01:09:40AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron) writes:
I tend to use make-kpkg if I'm building a kernel to use on a different
machine than the one I'm building it on, but otherwise I usually dont.
Kernel packages are handy if you wish to intstall the
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 01:14:49PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
[snip]
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding
another Provides: to kernel images
Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 01:14:49PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
[snip]
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
[snip]
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding
another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg):
Because too many people don't use debian kernel images.
How about only making
Adrian Bridgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
[snip]
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding
another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg):
Because too many people don't use
On Tue, 18 May, 1999, Michael Stone wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 02:26:09PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because too many people don't use debian kernel images.
If people don't use the tools, then they don't get the benefits of the
tools, which
oh, i probably should've mentioned this earlier, but i've been packaging
hftpd. i'm mostly done, but need to hack in an /etc/init.d script, and i think
i'll be done after that.
hftpd is a superb, linux-optimized ftpd. i am going to have a little bit
in the postinst that makes note that people
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote:
oh, i probably should've mentioned this earlier, but i've been packaging
hftpd. i'm mostly done, but need to hack in an /etc/init.d script, and i
think
i'll be done after that.
hftpd is a superb, linux-optimized ftpd. i am
How about a 2.2 and 2.0 version?
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding
another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg):
Package: kernel-image-2.2.7
Version: tr.pre0
Section: base
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
At 15:22 -0400 1999-05-18, Ben Collins wrote:
How about a 2.2 and 2.0 version?
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding
another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg):
Package: kernel-image-2.2.7
Version: tr.pre0
Section: base
Priority:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 07:54:08PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
hftpd is a superb, linux-optimized ftpd. i am going to have a little bit
in the postinst that makes note that people really should roll their own,
since it can use a lot of 2.2 kernel features and such. it was written
by
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We really should have a policy for things like this. How about adding
another Provides: to kernel images (built by the excellent make-kpkg):
Because too many people don't use debian kernel images.
If people don't use the tools, then they don't get
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 02:26:09PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because too many people don't use debian kernel images.
If people don't use the tools, then they don't get the benefits of the
tools, which is hardly our fault. This is like saying that we
15 matches
Mail list logo
