Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team

2010-02-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hi, > > This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions. > > Source package name > === > > The source package name for extension should not contain the name of the > enhanced application. These

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team

2010-02-02 Thread Benjamin Drung
2010/2/2 Mike Hommey : > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions. >> >> Source package name >> === >> >> The source package name for extension should not contain the name of the

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team

2010-02-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > 2010/2/2 Mike Hommey : > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions. > >> > >> Source package name > >> ===

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team

2010-02-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Mike Hommey wrote: > > I have a lintian check that checks most of the policy, except it was > written before lintian 2.3 and doesn't work anymore. If someone has the > time to update the script before me, I'll send it to them. If your plan is to get it into lintian itself (and I wouldn't see any