Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:47:07PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > > upstream what they are going to do? If they are going to keep pidof > > then the change is not required. If the projects plans is to > Which I did. > For the moment the

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-16 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > upstream what they are going to do? If they are going to keep pidof > then the change is not required. If the projects plans is to Which I did. For the moment they have no plans moving pidof though they don't seem terribly fussed eit

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:03:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > [...] > > AIUI, you've also proposed including the following list of binaries in > > procps-base: > > > procps-base: pidof, ps, sysctl, pgrep, pkill > > Currently, t

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-09 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > [sending this to both pkg-sysvinit-devel and debian-devel, instead of having > two separate threads.] Good idea. It looks like you're talking here not about the sysvinit maintainers, but > the *Red Hat* sysvinit maintainers. Perha

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-09 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:03:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Discussed here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/185723/focus=185725 That's the "leaving" side, the "arriving" side is. http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/Adopting-pidof-from-sysvinittools Not sure wha

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > AIUI, you've also proposed including the following list of binaries in > procps-base: > > > procps-base: pidof, ps, sysctl, pgrep, pkill > > Currently, the *only* one of these which is used as part of the essential > set is

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

2013-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
[sending this to both pkg-sysvinit-devel and debian-devel, instead of having two separate threads.] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:49:37PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 06:56:57PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > That sounds fine, I think. So on the sysvinit-utils side, we simply >