On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 00:37 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A; reported 2012-01-06
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name : nx-libs
> >Version : 3.5.0.3
> >Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel,
Op 13-01-12 02:22, John A. Sullivan III schreef:
> As SPICE improves, I think we should consider it
> seriously. Its cross platform support is very good which would no
> longer limit X2Go server to Windows only and the idea of an adaptive
> protocol is absolutely intriguing. I long for the day w
Hi Paul, hi John,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 09:30:09 CET Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 13-01-12 02:22, John A. Sullivan III schreef:
As SPICE improves, I think we should consider it
seriously. Its cross platform support is very good which would no
longer limit X2Go server to Windows only and the idea
clone 655618 -1
retitle 655618 ITP: nx-libs-light --- NX Protocol client-only libraries and
binaries
retitle -1 ITP: nx-libs --- NX Protocol client/server libraries and binaries
stop
On Fr, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:20:15 (CET), Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Paul, hi John,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 09:30:09 CET
Hi Reinhard, dear all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/nx-libs.git;a=tree
and, from what I see, is appropriate for being uploaded to unstable. For
clarity, I think we should rename the git repository from nx-libs.git t
Hi Reinhard, hi all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
clone 655618 -1
retitle 655618 ITP: nx-libs-light --- NX Protocol client-only
libraries and binaries
retitle -1 ITP: nx-libs --- NX Protocol client/server libraries and binaries
stop
Once you know the BTS no. of th
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 20:22 -0500, John A. Sullivan III a écrit :
> I am very concerned about the old X code, too and we are actively
> watching SPICE. SPICE has extraordinary potential but it is still
> slower than NX on WAN links - not much but enough to make a user
> noticeable difference
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 15:03 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 20:22 -0500, John A. Sullivan III a écrit :
> > I am very concerned about the old X code, too and we are actively
> > watching SPICE. SPICE has extraordinary potential but it is still
> > slower than NX on WAN
On 01/13/2012 10:03 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I am surprised NX is even considered for WAN usage. Our in-house tests
> showed that NX has a noticeable usability impact as soon as the latency
> reaches 10ms, while the figure goes up to 30ms for VNC - which is
> currently the only serious solutio
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2012 à 22:42 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> Seriously, have you ever tried using VNC across continents, with a
> *very* slow link? It's simply too slow, it takes ages to display a simple
> window.
latency != bandwidth
VNC requires more bandwidth, but being asynchronous,
On Jan 13, 2012 3:59 PM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2012 10:03 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I am surprised NX is even considered for WAN usage. Our in-house tests
> > showed that NX has a noticeable usability impact as soon as the latency
> > reaches 10ms, while the figure goes up to
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Reinhard, dear all,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/nx-libs.git;a=tree
> > and, from what I see, is appropriate for being uploaded to unstable. For
> > cl
Hi Stefan, hi all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 17:14:08 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Reinhard, dear all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/nx-libs.git;a=tree
> and,
13 matches
Mail list logo
