On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:17:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 02:47, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is there a difference in packages removed if you run aptitude install
aptitude instead of aptitude install aptitude dpkg? I don't see any
reason why dpkg needs to be upgraded
I agree with Steve. Just add perl to the list. Who the heck would have
removed perl anyway? When I have a chance, I'll try upgrading my
system and see how it goes.
Andrew Donnellan
On 5/20/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:17:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
* Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050517 03:35]:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
2. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to stable
I wish all documentation is using the distribution names not the symbolic
names. If you put stable in a file this will cause major trouble a
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 02:47, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is there a difference in packages removed if you run aptitude install
aptitude instead of aptitude install aptitude dpkg? I don't see any
reason why dpkg needs to be upgraded first, unlike aptitude.
No, makes no real difference. I still
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Long version:
The current version of the release notes tells users to (simplified):
1. apt-get install aptitude
2. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to stable
3. aptitude update
In my test a few days ago I had to use apt-get
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:28:05AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
retitle 309357 woody aptitude update can fail
quit
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:45:14PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Long version:
The current version of the
retitle 309357 woody aptitude update can fail
quit
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:45:14PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Long version:
The current version of the release notes tells users to (simplified):
1. apt-get install aptitude
On Monday 16 May 2005 17:58, Frans Pop wrote:
Should users first upgrade dpkg and aptitude before upgrading the rest
of the system or can the upgrade safely be done using Woody's version
of the package tools?
From the reactions to this thread and a thread on #309340 [1], the
consensus seems
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
1. Check that /etc/apt/sources.list points to woody
2. apt-get update
3. apt-get install aptitude
perhaps use --reinstall or aptitude/woody to force downgrade?
4. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to sarge
5. apt-get update
6. aptitude
Hi Frans,
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:31:29AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 17:58, Frans Pop wrote:
Should users first upgrade dpkg and aptitude before upgrading the rest
of the system or can the upgrade safely be done using Woody's version
of the package tools?
From the
Short version:
Should users first upgrade dpkg and aptitude before upgrading the rest of
the system or can the upgrade safely be done using Woody's version of the
package tools?
Long version:
The current version of the release notes tells users to (simplified):
1. apt-get install aptitude
2.
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Short version:
Should users first upgrade dpkg and aptitude before upgrading the rest of
the system or can the upgrade safely be done using Woody's version of the
package tools?
Long version:
The current version of the release
* Adrian Bunk [Mon, 16 May 2005 18:14:20 +0200]:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The current version of the release notes tells users to (simplified):
1. apt-get install aptitude
2. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to stable
3. aptitude update
4.
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:44:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Adrian Bunk [Mon, 16 May 2005 18:14:20 +0200]:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The current version of the release notes tells users to (simplified):
1. apt-get install aptitude
2. change the
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:44:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
1. apt-get install aptitude
2. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to stable
3. aptitude update
4. aptitude install aptitude dpkg
5. aptitude -f --with-recommends dist-upgrade
0. change the
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:44:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
...
Note that in (4), the command is aptitude, not apt-get.
Does this make any difference?
...
It does.
My fault, I confused (4) with (3).
cu
Adrian
--
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
2. change the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to stable
I wish all documentation is using the distribution names not the symbolic
names. If you put stable in a file this will cause major trouble a few
years later. Beside it is unclear to the reader when
17 matches
Mail list logo
