On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:21:41 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 04:47 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > For example if package is not maintained for years we can certainly wait
> > for a month or two before orphaning even though there may be no need to
> > wait that long.
>
> This unfortunately can
On 10/27/2012 04:47 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
For example if package is not maintained for years we can certainly wait for a
month or two before orphaning even though there may be no need to wait that
long.
This unfortunately cannot be set as a rule. Sometimes, a package that was
left unmaintain
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:56:02 Bart Martens wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:06:57AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > If bug was unanswered for let's say two months the package is free to
> > orphan
>
> Some prefer no delay, some prefer one month, some prefer two months. I
> originally wanted on
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:06:57AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> If bug was unanswered for let's say two months the package is free to orphan
Some prefer no delay, some prefer one month, some prefer two months. I
originally wanted one month, but I got convinced by others to drop the delay.
Now
4 matches
Mail list logo
