On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:59:33PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
(f) you agree to defend and indemnify Sun and its licensors from
and against any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement amounts
and/or expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in
connection
On 5/19/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
(b) the Software is distributed with your Operating System, and
such distribution is solely for the purposes of running Programs
under the control of your Operating System and designing,
developing and
Michael wrote:
Speaking realistically, such a move of Sun would be spectacularly bad PR
for them esp. considering their statements about future Java licensing
efforts they have committed to.
That's true. But why did they release this license and used no other
wording?
You
On 5/19/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The software as distributed is complete, it has all the files in the
.deb packages, and the dependencies ensure that on the user's system the
software layout is like Sun requires, with the optional bits indeed
being optional.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
(b) the Software is distributed with your Operating System, and
such distribution is solely for the purposes of running Programs
under the control of your Operating System and designing,
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:18:57PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Note that the license says ... is distributed *with* your Operating
System, and not is part of. I don't know where you read the part of
bit? Anyway, we definitely do distribute non-free *with* our OS, it's in
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:18:57PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Note that the license says ... is distributed *with* your Operating
System, and not is part of. I don't know where you read the part of
bit? Anyway, we definitely do distribute non-free *with* our OS, it's in
Let me reply to at least some of the points raised here right now. By
the way, one of the Sun engineers was involved in packaging, and
actually wrote (with help from others) part of the license agreement
code etc. using debconf. I don't think that has any legal value (but I'm
not a legal expert),
Let me first preface this with a caveat and an apology: after the fact
it was pointed out that the mail I sent was needlesly inflamatory;
that was not my intention and for that I apologize. I also appreciate
the desire of Sun to work with Debian in order to create a license
that distributions can
9 matches
Mail list logo
