Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal)

Hello David, * David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2005-08-21 19:44 -0400]: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:29:51PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Wouter Verhelst] > > >b) the three beforementioned teams could already refuse to > > >support a port anyhow, simply by not doing the w

Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal)

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:29:51PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Wouter Verhelst] > >b) the three beforementioned teams could already refuse to > >support a port anyhow, simply by not doing the work. > > This is not really a valid argument. If a team in debian refuses to > accept d

Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal)

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:29:51PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Wouter Verhelst] > >b) the three beforementioned teams could already refuse to > >support a port anyhow, simply by not doing the work. > This is not really a valid argument. If a team in debian refuses to > accept de

Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal)

[Wouter Verhelst] >b) the three beforementioned teams could already refuse to >support a port anyhow, simply by not doing the work. This is not really a valid argument. If a team in debian refuses to accept decisions made by a majority of debian developers, or rejects democratic control,