Il lun, 2002-04-22 alle 16:18, Rune B. Broberg ha scritto:
[snip]
> 0.9 compared to 0.89 would then be the same as 0.90 compared to 0.89?
> Not good.
NO. 0.9 < 0.89 because 89 > 9.
--
Federico Di Gregorio
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact[EMAIL PROTECTED]
INIT.D Develope
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 04:18:21PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:58:21AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> > Many developers don't consider those identical, though. I wonder if
> > fields should be zero-padded to equal width before comparison? So
> > comparing 0.01 and 0.1,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:58:21AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > point in versions is not decimal separator, but major or minor version
> > separator. So
> >
> > 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1
> >
> > all means
> >
> > major version=0
> > first minor
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:58:21AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > point in versions is not decimal separator, but major or minor version
> > separator. So
> > 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1
> > all means
> > major version=0
> > first minor version=1
> Ma
Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> point in versions is not decimal separator, but major or minor version
> separator. So
>
> 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1
>
> all means
>
> major version=0
> first minor version=1
Many developers don't consider those identical, though. I wonder if
fi
> What exactly do you mean by numerically? Is 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1 ==
> 1.0 == 10 == 10? What should be watched out for?
>From the debian policy manual (section 4):
"The strings are compared from left to right.
First the initial part of each string consisting entirely of non-digit
charac
Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > that's right. dpkg compares numbers ... numerically. so 0.01 and 0.1 are
> > equivalent. then -6 > -3.
>
> What exactly do you mean by numerically? Is 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1 ==
> 1.0 == 10 == 10? What should be w
commence Alan Shutko quotation:
> Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> that's right. dpkg compares numbers ... numerically. so 0.01 and
>> 0.1 are equivalent. then -6 > -3.
>
> What exactly do you mean by numerically?
Leading zeroes after the decimal point are ignored, by the lo
Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that's right. dpkg compares numbers ... numerically. so 0.01 and 0.1 are
> equivalent. then -6 > -3.
What exactly do you mean by numerically? Is 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1 ==
1.0 == 10 == 10? What should be watched out for?
--
Alan Shutko <[E
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Hi, i'm creating the cvs-autoreleasedeb package, and the version is
> growing, so I started at 0.01-1 and now I'm on 0.1-3. But when I tried
> to install it i received the following warning:
Call it 0.10-3.
Ivo
--
Norton SystemWorks 2002 includes a file erasure pr
Il lun, 2002-04-22 alle 13:51, Daniel Ruoso ha scritto:
> dpkg - aviso: rebaixando cvs-autoreleasedeb de 0.01-6 para 0.1-3.
that's right. dpkg compares numbers ... numerically. so 0.01 and 0.1 are
equivalent. then -6 > -3.
--
Federico Di Gregorio
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contac
Hi, i'm creating the cvs-autoreleasedeb package, and the version is
growing, so I started at 0.01-1 and now I'm on 0.1-3. But when I tried
to install it i received the following warning:
Did I miss something?
dpkg - warning: downgrading cvs-autoreleasedeb from 0.01-6 to 0.1-3.
--
signature.as
dpkg - aviso: rebaixando cvs-autoreleasedeb de 0.01-6 para 0.1-3.
--
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Ruoso
Desenvolvimento de Sistemas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oktiva Telecomunicações e Informática
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
13 matches
Mail list logo
