On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:12:55PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]:
> > > People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between
> > > IPsec
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]:
> > People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between
> > IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able to apply grsecurity to
> > De
also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]:
> People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between
> IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able to apply grsecurity to
> Debian kernel source, I'd take IPsec anyday.
Well, I would do it the other
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> It's amazing how problem solving here is equated with "actively
> waiting for problems to go away".
>
> I wanted to improve Debian, but apparently there is no interest.
> Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants beca
Hi, martin f krafft wrote:
> Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants because
> apparently noone gives a flying food.
Disagree. Some people, myself among them, have stated their unhappiness.
To me personally, though, it doesn't matter that much. I'd rather spend
the time on gettng
It's amazing how problem solving here is equated with "actively
waiting for problems to go away".
I wanted to improve Debian, but apparently there is no interest.
Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants because
apparently noone gives a flying food.
I am thus closing the issue for m
6 matches
Mail list logo