Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Wookey
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2012-07-20 21:27 +0100]: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem. > > It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW. > > > > *) http://lists.debian.o

Re: [Arm-netbook] ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, I have a spec sheet to devices for English. I ask whether this can be distributed. Please wait. Nobuhiro 2012/7/21 Dr. David Alan Gilbert : > * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, 19 Jul 20

Re: [Arm-netbook] ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 > > Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> buildds > >> === > >> > >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We > >

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 > Steve McIntyre wrote: >> buildds >> === >> >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We >> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using >> developm

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-19 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2012/7/20 Hideki Yamane : > Hi, > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 > Steve McIntyre wrote: >> buildds >> === >> >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We >> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using >> development boards as build machi

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-19 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > buildds > === > > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We > don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using > development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA > for ho

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-19 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We > [...] >> (*1) and if someone _rea

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We [...] > (*1) and if someone _really_ wants a debug build of that particular > problematic packag

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-19 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We > don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using > development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA > for hosting and they're not designe

ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ] Hi folks, Here's a summary of what we discussed in the ARM ports BoF [1] last week (10th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've also attached the Gobby n