On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:13:03AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>This is the third time this year that patch has been incorrectly
>>>ascribed to OpenBSD.
>
>>Sorry for the misundertanding. I'll fix the lynx changelog file.
>>I just used the pat
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>This is the third time this year that patch has been incorrectly
>>ascribed to OpenBSD.
> Sorry for the misundertanding. I'll fix the lynx changelog file.
> I just used the patch from 2.8.5-2sarge2 in stable-security.
ok. Perhaps you should r
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:19:02AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>
>>Format: 1.7
>>Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:41:49 +1000
>>Source: lynx
>>Binary: lynx
>>Architecture: source i386 sparc amd64
>>Version: 2.8.5-
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:41:49 +1000
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source i386 sparc amd64
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1.2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: high
> Maintainer:
4 matches
Mail list logo