Am Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:31:47 +0200
schrieb Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
The bigger problem is later during boot when you need to wait for all
devices to appear so /usr, /home, ... can be mounted. One way to solve
this would be to have the fsck and mounting of filesystems wait for
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
There is one big problem with an event based startup. Specifically for
raid1/4/5/6 devices. Those you can use just fine with missing devices
but the boot should really wait for all device to be present.
Well, this problem arises with
Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net writes:
Hi.
I do not see how a event based initsystem would us actually help (but
perhaps I just don't understand it well enough).
I mean an event would be something like mount root-fs but then it
would be still completely open, on what to
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 01:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
You're looking for tmpfs and pivot_root. The latter is a hack that's needed
only because of kernel threads, if you're the only process chroot() and
chdir() should be enough.
Of course,.. I rather meant,.. whether there are chances that
Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net writes:
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
[... waiting for enough devices to show up ...]
The only known solution today is to add a
Hi.
I do not see how a event based initsystem would us actually help (but
perhaps I just don't understand it well enough).
I mean an event would be something like mount root-fs but then it
would be still completely open, on what to actually do for that.
I'm also do some thinking/planning on
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Regarding the shutdown thingy... is there any chance that Debian would
introduce kind of un-initramfs-images, in order to really unmount (not
remount,ro) and then cleanly close all open block devices?
Or do we have to
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Christoph Anton Mitterer]
Hi folks.
IIRC, Jonas already put some of these issues up here some time ago.
I was recently investigating, and thanks to the help of many people
found out how deep the problems actually are.
I suspect this problem is
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
There is one big problem with an event based startup. Specifically for
raid1/4/5/6 devices. Those you can use just fine with missing devices but
the boot should really wait for all device to be present.
This problem is not
[Goswin von Brederlow]
There is one big problem with an event based startup. Specifically
for raid1/4/5/6 devices. Those you can use just fine with missing
devices but the boot should really wait for all device to be
present.
This problem is not specific for event based startup. It also
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
There is one big problem with an event based startup. Specifically
for raid1/4/5/6 devices. Those you can use just fine with missing
devices but the boot should really wait for all device to be
present.
This problem is not
Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net writes:
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
There is one big problem with an event based startup. Specifically for
raid1/4/5/6 devices. Those you can use just fine with missing devices but
the boot should really wait for all
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes:
Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net writes:
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
[... waiting for enough devices to show up ...]
The only known solution today is to add a long delay during boot to try to
increase
[Christoph Anton Mitterer]
Hi folks.
IIRC, Jonas already put some of these issues up here some time ago.
I was recently investigating, and thanks to the help of many people
found out how deep the problems actually are.
I suspect this problem is one best solved by using an event based
system
Hi folks.
IIRC, Jonas already put some of these issues up here some time ago.
I was recently investigating, and thanks to the help of many people
found out how deep the problems actually are.
Following a discussion at lkml
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1003210), I've decided that
15 matches
Mail list logo
