Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstream project

2003-11-04 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed] > > Hi folks, > > We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently > looking at creating a complete documentation > set using docbook, for output formats and i18n > reasons. That's great. Thanks. > T

Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstream project

2003-11-04 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Knowing that: > - NUT is a pure GPL project, thus we need a _free_ > documentation licence, > > So, what are your advices about choosing a _free_ > documentation licence for NUT? Why not use the GPL to cover the documentation as wel

Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstream project

2003-11-04 Thread Arnaud Quette
[@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed] Hi folks, We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently looking at creating a complete documentation set using docbook, for output formats and i18n reasons. This improvement in the upstream will, by side effect, (re)create a nut-doc package in