Re: [Debconf-discuss] Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-06-04 Thread Lars Wirzenius
su, 2006-05-28 kello 18:40 -0500, Andrew McMillan kirjoitti: > (a) Order the list of keysigning participants by centrality. It might be interesting to compare the optimal grouping of people to a random one, using the "matrix" style of keysigning party I proposed after the Debconf5 one. See [1] for

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 03:49:28PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 06:40:28PM -0500, Andrew McMillan wrote: > >On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 04:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >>On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > >> > >>>I imagine an improve

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-28 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 06:40:28PM -0500, Andrew McMillan wrote: >On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 04:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >>On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: >> >>>I imagine an improved protocol for the keysigning, which is based on >>>an idea I overheard after the p

Re: Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-28 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:23 -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > Taking this to debian-devel... > > also sprach Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.28.1840 -0500]: > > (c) Allocate partcipants to the groups in a round robin following > > centrality order and starting with the most central. >

Re: Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-28 Thread Martin Langhoff
On 5/29/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also, what do we do if the central people don't show up? It's been known to happen at KSPs. Put more than one in each subgroup, and have a coordinator ready to shift the central people around if a given subgroup is really orphaned. Or split

Re: Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-28 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:23 -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > Taking this to debian-devel... > > also sprach Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.28.1840 -0500]: > > (c) Allocate partcipants to the groups in a round robin following > > centrality order and starting with the most central. >

Re: Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-28 Thread martin f krafft
Taking this to debian-devel... also sprach Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.28.1840 -0500]: > (c) Allocate partcipants to the groups in a round robin following > centrality order and starting with the most central. This sounds great. We might want to consider letting people with exper

Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-28 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 04:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > > > I imagine an improved protocol for the keysigning, which is based on > > an idea I overheard after the party (and someone mentioned it in the > > thread): instead of th