Re: An alternative analysis of the etch architecture proposal

2005-04-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:50:23PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > [...] > > - issues with space on ftp.debian.org and on mirrors > > (especially hindering amd64) > > > > It might be a better point to start moving non-released architectures > > (GNU Hurd and sh) to a diff

Re: An alternative analysis of the etch architecture proposal

2005-03-15 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:50:23PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: [...] > - issues with space on ftp.debian.org and on mirrors > (especially hindering amd64) > > It might be a better point to start moving non-released architectures > (GNU Hurd and sh) to a different location. Depending on what exact

An alternative analysis of the etch architecture proposal

2005-03-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Let's analyze the requirements the release team sent for release architectures: - it must first be part of (or at the very least, meet the criteria for) scc.debian.org (see below) - there must be a developer-accessible debian.org machine for the architecture. That's obvious. - the release