Re: Another gnutls ABI change / (small) mass bug filing

2005-08-03 Thread Simon Josefsson
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The change was discussed on the mailing list: >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464 >> >> If you had reported this problem to us, we would fix it. >> > Sorry about that -- I didn't read the list consistently. > M

Re: Another gnutls ABI change / (small) mass bug filing

2005-08-03 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Simon Josefsson: > > Gnutls in Debian is properly versioned (as opposed to Upstream, which > > dropped the versioning script for no good reason), and thus I am > > The change was discussed on the mailing list: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464 > > If you

Re: Another gnutls ABI change / (small) mass bug filing

2005-08-03 Thread Simon Josefsson
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > gnutls changed their ABI again. ... > Gnutls in Debian is properly versioned (as opposed to Upstream, which > dropped the versioning script for no good reason), and thus I am The change was discussed on the mailing list: http://thread.gmane.

Another gnutls ABI change / (small) mass bug filing

2005-07-29 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, gnutls changed their ABI again. Due to historical reasons (the API changes in the past were somewhat intrusive), the -dev package of libgnutls had been named libgnutls{,10,11}-dev. The API is now sufficiently stable that this naming scheme does not make sense any more. Therefore, in the last