Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The change was discussed on the mailing list:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464
>>
>> If you had reported this problem to us, we would fix it.
>>
> Sorry about that -- I didn't read the list consistently.
> M
Hi,
Simon Josefsson:
> > Gnutls in Debian is properly versioned (as opposed to Upstream, which
> > dropped the versioning script for no good reason), and thus I am
>
> The change was discussed on the mailing list:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464
>
> If you
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> gnutls changed their ABI again.
...
> Gnutls in Debian is properly versioned (as opposed to Upstream, which
> dropped the versioning script for no good reason), and thus I am
The change was discussed on the mailing list:
http://thread.gmane.
Hi,
gnutls changed their ABI again.
Due to historical reasons (the API changes in the past were somewhat
intrusive), the -dev package of libgnutls had been named
libgnutls{,10,11}-dev. The API is now sufficiently stable that this
naming scheme does not make sense any more.
Therefore, in the last
4 matches
Mail list logo