Re: Answers to Why is package X not in testing yet?

2003-05-15 Thread Björn Stenberg
Joe Buck wrote: However, the output is redundant in many cases. Fixed now. -- Björn

Re: Answers to Why is package X not in testing yet?

2003-05-15 Thread Joe Buck
Joe Buck wrote: However, the output is redundant in many cases. On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote: Fixed now. Terrific! I'm impressed at your bug-fixing speed; there's a quick fixed now to almost every issue. This script is a huge contribution. I have one more

Re: Answers to Why is package X not in testing yet?

2003-05-15 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Thursday 15 May 2003 09:51 am, Joe Buck wrote: Joe Buck wrote: However, the output is redundant in many cases. On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote: Fixed now. Terrific! I'm impressed at your bug-fixing speed; there's a quick fixed now to almost every

Re: Answers to Why is package X not in testing yet?

2003-05-15 Thread Simon Huggins
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:51:15AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote: Updating fam makes 177 packages uninstallable on alpha: amor, ark, bibletime, dcoppython, eyesapplet, fifteenapplet, galeon-nautilus, ... I can't figure out why this is

Re: Answers to Why is package X not in testing yet?

2003-05-14 Thread Joe Buck
Really cool script. Thanks for doing it. However, the output is redundant in many cases. For example, http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnome-terminal repeats the same information for libgnome, gnome-vfs2, and other packages a number of times. This would seem simple to fix: just