Re: Bug#671711: Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group] Bug#671711: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'

2012-08-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 08 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hmmm, so I had prepared a patch which basically checks if the package > has its dependencies fulfilled before calling the postinst script with > "triggered", and otherwise defers the trigger processing for later (but > only as long as it is not runni

Re: Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group] Bug#671711: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'

2012-06-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:12:14 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > […] > > > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > > 'testing'. > > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fail

Re: Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group] Bug#671711: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'

2012-05-23 Thread Ian Jackson
Iain Lane writes ("Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group] Bug#671711: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'"): > Greetings, > > [ I already asked this on d-dpkg, but go no response, so am "re-posting" > this question

Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group] Bug#671711: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'

2012-05-22 Thread Iain Lane
Greetings, [ I already asked this on d-dpkg, but go no response, so am "re-posting" this question to -devel. The original report along with full log is in #671711 ] On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > […] > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your pa