Re: BIND 9.X, shared libraries, and package pools

2001-01-05 Thread Brian May
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Josip> Oh, of course. (Packages including several shared libraries Josip> suck as far as our naming scheme is concerned :o) Does bind come with multiple libraries? If so, I think they should really be split up, according to standard

Re: BIND 9.X, shared libraries, and package pools

2001-01-06 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian May) writes: > Does bind come with multiple libraries? Yes. Four, I think. Ok, I haven't looked at our policies for shared libs for a while, and I obviously have some reading to do. Thanks for the warnings. Bdale

Re: BIND 9.X, shared libraries, and package pools

2001-01-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:44:01AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Josip> Oh, of course. (Packages including several shared libraries > Josip> suck as far as our naming scheme is concerned :o) > > Does bind come with multiple libraries? If so, I think they should > really be split up, according