Re: BTS LDAP interface (or something) broken?

2006-02-02 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Wouter Verhelst in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Obviously something broke. Perhaps the ldap interface to the BTS, since > > packages.qa.debian.org is giving bogus results too. > > I'm guessing the LDAP interface is temporarily offline; aba mentioned a > few days ago that he's moving some of his se

Re: BTS LDAP interface (or something) broken?

2006-02-02 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:08:41PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > bts.turmzimmer.net just went nuts: > >Changes at Thu Feb 2 0:10:06 CET 2006: > (all but six RC bugs are supposedly "solved" simultaneously) > > Obviously something broke. Perhaps the ldap interface to the BTS, since > packages.qa

BTS LDAP interface (or something) broken?

2006-02-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
bts.turmzimmer.net just went nuts: >Changes at Thu Feb 2 0:10:06 CET 2006: (all but six RC bugs are supposedly "solved" simultaneously) Obviously something broke. Perhaps the ldap interface to the BTS, since packages.qa.debian.org is giving bogus results too. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTEC