Hi,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:18:33PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2013/12/3 Aurelien Jarno :
>
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> >> 5.2 Setup arm64 debian-ports
> >>
> >>
> >> ⁃ arm64 setup as new bootstrapping port
> >>
Hello,
> That being said: becoming a DD would be ok for me, but would it be ok with
> the project as well? The scope of my work would be rather limited, I think...
We have non-programming DDs
http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20101019
http://www.debian.org/vote/2010/vote_002
which is not exactly
]] Ingo Jürgensmann
> Trying to convince me to become a DD is as old as running Arrakis as
> second m68k buildd to Kullervo. Over 12 years now. Back then it would
> have been easy: just say "Yes, I want to be a DD, here's my gpg key!"
Not really, I became a DD about then and went through the ful
Ingo Jürgensmann dixit:
>Because I didn't want to do any packaging at all, it became impossible
>at some point until DMs and such were introduced. Somewhen I decided
It’s even better now: we have “non-packaging developers”, e.g. people
who work on, say, exclusively the press team.
>to apply, but
Am 03.12.2013 um 13:40 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
> I’d love to have a bit more incentive to get people like Ingo, who
> has been doing m68k buildd work for, I believe, a decade, to become
Hmmm, since March 2001, if my archive serves me correctly.
> at least a Debian member. On the other hand, w
On 12/03/2013 01:40 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I’d really like to get everyone who’s got root on the m68k buildds,
> or physical access to it¹, to be a member of the project, though…
I second that!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.o
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42:56 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 23:08, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 5 arm64 Debian port support
> > ═══
> >
> > If Debian is unable to find ARM 64-bit hardware before Jessie gets
> > frozen, it likely won't be Jessie suppo
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:30:16PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2013/12/3 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
>
> > Would this be a Qt problem related to the emulator or the the toolkit
> > itself?
>
> That was a comment done by Canonical folks, iirc Adam Conrad, talking
> from their experience on emu
+++ Aurelien Jarno [2013-12-03 01:56 +0100]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 5.2 Setup arm64 debian-ports
> >
> >
> > ⁃ arm64 setup as new bootstrapping port
> > ⁃ manual builds could be uploaded but possible lack of spac
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:30:16PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2013/12/3 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
> > Hector Oron wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> 5.1 Enable buildd support
> >> ─
> >>
> >> ⁃ Fast model system (initial bootstrapping only)
> >> ⁃ QEMU support (bootstrapping
Hello,
2013/12/3 Dmitrijs Ledkovs :
> On 2 December 2013 23:08, Hector Oron wrote:
>> 5 arm64 Debian port support
>> ═══
>>
>> If Debian is unable to find ARM 64-bit hardware before Jessie gets
>> frozen, it likely won't be Jessie supported.
>>
>>
> What is the oppor
>> I don't really see the point, as it is already the case. Actually most
>> of the uploaders in debian-ports are non-DD, and it is something that
>> should not be lost in the transfer either.
>
>If debian-ports is converted to official Debian service, then all the
>user database is extracted from
KiBi wrote:
>Dmitrijs Ledkovs (2013-12-03):
>> What is the opportunity cost here? Are there no machine available
>> within budget? If that's the case, what's the current budget that
>> Debian Project can contribute, and what's the shortage to buy ARM
>> 64-bit hardware *today*?
>arm64 hardware
Hello,
2013/12/3 Aurelien Jarno :
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>> 5.2 Setup arm64 debian-ports
>>
>>
>> ⁃ arm64 setup as new bootstrapping port
>> ⁃ manual builds could be uploaded but possible lack of space
>> ⁃ 9 more packages
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (2013-12-03):
> On 2 December 2013 23:08, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 5 arm64 Debian port support
> > ═══
> >
> > If Debian is unable to find ARM 64-bit hardware before Jessie gets
> > frozen, it likely won't be Jessie supported.
> >
> >
>
> What is the op
On 2 December 2013 23:08, Hector Oron wrote:
> 5 arm64 Debian port support
> ═══
>
> If Debian is unable to find ARM 64-bit hardware before Jessie gets
> frozen, it likely won't be Jessie supported.
>
>
What is the opportunity cost here? Are there no machine available
Hello,
(Adding CC to person that done the comment)
2013/12/3 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
> Hector Oron wrote:
> [snip]
>> 5.1 Enable buildd support
>> ─
>>
>> ⁃ Fast model system (initial bootstrapping only)
>> ⁃ QEMU support (bootstrapping to the point of a buildd
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Hector Oron wrote:
> 12 Flashable image generation
> ═
>
> 12.1 Discussion on supporting pre-installed images
> ──
>
> ⁃ Just fix DI to work on the expected platforms.
> ⁃ Document ways
Hector Oron wrote:
[snip]
> 5.1 Enable buildd support
> ─
>
> ⁃ Fast model system (initial bootstrapping only)
> ⁃ QEMU support (bootstrapping to the point of a buildd image &
> recompile it all again)
> ⁃ Real hardware accessible to Debian (?)
> ⁃ Qt issues m
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> 5.2 Setup arm64 debian-ports
>
>
> ⁃ arm64 setup as new bootstrapping port
> ⁃ manual builds could be uploaded but possible lack of space
> ⁃ 9 more packages needed for a minimal bootstrap
I hav
20 matches
Mail list logo
