> On Jun 12, joost witteveen wrote
> >
> > Well, OK, I can see *somebody* wants this.
> > But still I'm not convinced this warrants inclusion in stable.
> > Are there other people that would like the dependancy change
> >
> > - Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)
> > + Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.1
On Jun 12, joost witteveen wrote
>
> Well, OK, I can see *somebody* wants this.
> But still I'm not convinced this warrants inclusion in stable.
> Are there other people that would like the dependancy change
>
> - Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)
> + Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)|svgadummy
>
I've missed the start of this discussion, but I'm the maintainer of
svgalib-dummy, and the issue of dependencies came up already several
times...
> Are there other people that would like the dependancy change
>
> - Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)
> + Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)|svgadummy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen) writes:
>> Because they want to run remote X Sessions.
> So it will at least not just be a web-server. But anyway, I get your
> point.
So it could be just a web server that people want to maintain using a GUI
editor.
Well, OK, I can see *somebody* wants this.
But still I'm not convinced this warrants inclusion in stable.
Are there other people that would like the dependancy change
- Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)
+ Depends: svgalib1 (>= 1:1.2.10-2)|svgadummy
to go into stable?
> >> Sorry but this is stab
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>> Sorry but this is stable bug. And its significant for people running Bo as
>> a webserver etc which usually does not have a display or even a video
>> board. I have a series of those machine that I maintain.
>
>You mean, they have gs installed, but no
6 matches
Mail list logo