Date: 16 Apr 2003 19:08:17 -0400
From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: laptop-net
Severity: serious
I just installed "laptop-net", becuase it looked similar to
something I'd like to work on.
The first thing it asked me was whether I wanted to "manage" its
confi
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
>
> I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> I consider a proper fix is to redefine the configuration files so that
> they can be parsed. I have learned, the hard way, that using shell
> scripts for configuration fil
On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> > I consider a proper fix is to redefine the configuration files so that
> > they can be parsed. I have learned, the
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > > I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> > > I consider a proper fix is to redefine the conf
> > OTOH, xml config files (like fontconfig's config) could be losslessly
> > parsed
> > through xslt processing...
>
> Much like any other config file can be losslessly parsed by processing
> them. That's not really very helpful.
However, it could be something of a "standard" for configuration
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > > > I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> > > > I consider a
On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 06:47, Mike Hommey wrote:
> OTOH, xml config files (like fontconfig's config) could be losslessly parsed
> through xslt processing...
I know, but I haven't done this because expat (AFAICS) doesn't provide a
command-line tool to do XSLT, and Depend:ing on xsltproc (which use
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:45:54AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > > > > I'd rather
Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In most cases, the only feature that's used (and needed) of XML that it
> stores a tree of attribute/value pairs.
>
> Given limited effort, I am absolutely convinced that it should be
> possible to come up with a more robust, well defined, simple(!),
9 matches
Mail list logo
