Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-07-02 Thread Mathieu Roy
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:07:12 -0500, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: I`ll proceed in the time order of events: Tue, 17 Jun

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-07-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:07:12 -0500, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: I`ll proceed in the time order of events: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: I`ve produced a

Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Samium Gromoff
I`ll proceed in the time order of events: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out with a *** Virtual memory exhausted. Stop message on a perfectly valid, sane and real-world Makefile. link:

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: I`ll proceed in the time order of events: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out with a *** Virtual memory exhausted. Stop message on a perfectly valid, sane and

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: I`ll proceed in the time order of events: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out with a *** Virtual memory