Bug#22206: Some package uses psmisc without a dependency

1998-05-08 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 7 May 1998, James Troup wrote: > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyway, since psmisc is not essential (and this is what really > > matters), it would be interesting to know which package uses killall > > (if any) and where, to add the approp

Bug#22206: Some package uses psmisc without a dependency

1998-05-07 Thread James Troup
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, since psmisc is not essential (and this is what really > matters), it would be interesting to know which package uses killall > (if any) and where, to add the appropriate Dependency. Maintainer scripts (and most everything else) should not use k

Bug#22206: Some package uses psmisc without a dependency

1998-05-07 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: general Version: 1998-05-07 Today I have just tried the new APT on a libc5 machine to upgrade to hamm. [ Looks promising! ]. Well, from the hundreds of messages I was able to see a "killall: command not found" or something alike. I am quite surprised to see that psmisc is just optional (