Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libevolution-ruby
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tom Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://revolution.rubyforge.org/
* License : BSD
Description : revolu
Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
> client.
Is it so little that it would be better to include it with the
evolution package?
--
Henning Makholm "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:31 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
> > client.
>
> Is it so little that it would be better to include it with the
> evolution package?
Not quite sur
Hi, Adam M. wrote:
> Thus, libevelution-ruby doesn't need to depend on Ruby. It only needs to
> depend on evolution.
What happens if/when ruby is updated in a non-binary-compatible way?
Or if/when somebody decides to remove ruby since, after all, nothing
depends on it?
If that happens, you have
* Matthias Urlichs [Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:46:45 +0100]:
> Hi, Adam M. wrote:
> > Thus, libevelution-ruby doesn't need to depend on Ruby. It only needs to
> > depend on evolution.
> What happens if/when ruby is updated in a non-binary-compatible way?
> Or if/when somebody decides to remove ruby sinc
David Moreno Garza wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:31 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>
>>Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
>>>client.
>>>
>>>
>>Is it so little that it would be better to in
6 matches
Mail list logo
