Dear Developers!
I have a question concerning the .orig.tar.gz files for the following
ITP:
On Fre, 10 Jun 2005, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: texlive
> Version : 2005.1
> Upstream Au
Hallo Frank, hallo Adrian!
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> TeX-Live exists for a couple of years now, and while it might gain some
> teTeX users, teTeX upstream is by no means dead. So for these users,
Definitely. Thomas is himself actively contributing to TeXlive.
> One other thing
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:41:47AM +0200, frank wrote:
>>
>> If we had texlive in Debian, there wouldn't be such pressure. teTeX
>> would be updated to the current version shortly after a release, and
>> then would stick to that upstream version no mat
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:41:47AM +0200, frank wrote:
>
> If we had texlive in Debian, there wouldn't be such pressure. teTeX
> would be updated to the current version shortly after a release, and
> then would stick to that upstream version no matter what happened until
> the next release. And
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 13 June 2005 09.41, frank wrote:
> [texlive vs. teTeX]
>> Let me add some comments from my point of view (Debian teTeX
>> maintainer).
>
> Sounds like packaging texlive and trying to get it really stable would be
> the thing to do, with the
On Monday 13 June 2005 09.41, frank wrote:
[texlive vs. teTeX]
> Let me add some comments from my point of view (Debian teTeX
> maintainer).
Sounds like packaging texlive and trying to get it really stable would be
the thing to do, with the goal of phasing out teTeX for etch+1
Not becuase I don'
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Norbert Preining in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> * Package name: texlive
>> Description : The TeXlive system packaged for debian
>>
>> TeX Live is an easy way to get up and running with TeX. It includes all
>> major freely-available TeX-related
On Son, 12 Jun 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > It is one the one hand a live dvd, but also one of the most complete TeX
> > systems. There are several differences between tetex and texlive,
> > especially wrt the granularity of packaging. See the discussion on
> > tetex-maint ML which I had with
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 19:15 +0200, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> On Fre, 10 Jun 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > * Package name: texlive
> > > Description : The TeXlive system packaged for debian
> >
> > The website looks like that's a "live" tex CD. What's the difference
> > to a n
On Fre, 10 Jun 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > * Package name: texlive
> > Description : The TeXlive system packaged for debian
>
> The website looks like that's a "live" tex CD. What's the difference
> to a normal "apt-get install tetex-extra" installation on Debian?
It is one the one
Re: Norbert Preining in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Package name: texlive
> Description : The TeXlive system packaged for debian
>
> TeX Live is an easy way to get up and running with TeX. It includes all
> major freely-available TeX-related programs, macro packages, and fonts,
> including s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: texlive
Version : 2005.1
Upstream Author : TeXlive Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.tug.org/texlive
* License : mixed, but all Debian conform
Descri
12 matches
Mail list logo
