David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm wondering if this wouldn't be better added as a feature to
aptitude/synaptic, as people who would use apt-get or dpkg would
probably know grep. The people he was targetting are more likely to use
one of the package selection tools.
Why not have it
On Jul 10, 2005 at 07:01, Goswin von Brederlow praised the llamas by saying:
David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm wondering if this wouldn't be better added as a feature to
aptitude/synaptic, as people who would use apt-get or dpkg would
probably know grep. The people he was
Hi,
* David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-10 13:07]:
On Jul 10, 2005 at 07:01, Goswin von Brederlow praised the llamas by saying:
David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Why not have it in dpkg and have aptitude or synaptic use it in turn?
Why limit it to higher level frontends
On Jul 10, 2005 at 12:26, Goswin von Brederlow praised the llamas by saying:
David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The backend does have it. It logs the information. Higher level tools just
need to read the file in and display it. Why add grep functionality to
dpkg when we already have
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 02:14:22AM]:
sudo apt-history show upgrade
2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade gstreamer0.8-alsa=0.8.8-3
0.8.10-1
2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade libbonobo2-common=2.8.1-2
2.10.0-1
2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade
On Jul 09, 2005 at 01:14, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Ok, now I had a look on the log file.
I think apt-history is different. If you want you can see
the same info but the log is a typical logfile. You have to
use grep and other coreutils to get for example the new
version of a
Hallo David,
* David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 12:02]:
On Jul 09, 2005 at 01:14, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
sn
beebo root% grep upgrade /var/log/dpkg.log | tail
2005-07-09 01:17:02 upgrade eog 2.10.0-0.2 2.10.2-0.1
2005-07-09 01:17:09 upgrade gaim 1:1.3.1-2
Hi,
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 12:02]:
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 02:14:22AM]:
sudo apt-history show upgrade
2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade gstreamer0.8-alsa=0.8.8-3
0.8.10-1
2005-07-09 00:12:03: upgrade libbonobo2-common=2.8.1-2
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
But for example:
apt-history show install
2005-07-09 00:12:03: install libstdc++6-4.0-dev
4.0.0-12
2005-07-09 00:12:03: install libaa1
1.4p5-28
2005-07-09 00:12:03:
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:02]:
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
[...]
I think there is apt-history a better way.
For doing what exactly?
For doing this without corebutils.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:02]:
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
I think there is apt-history a better way.
For doing what exactly?
For doing this without corebutils.
Coreutils is
Hallo Matthew,
* Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:09]:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:02]:
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 12:06:54PM]:
I think there is apt-history a better way.
For
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Hallo Matthew,
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
sed, awk etc. but in my opinion this should be so easy as
Hallo David,
* David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:20]:
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
sed, awk
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:04:23PM]:
I think there is apt-history a better way.
For doing what exactly?
For doing this without corebutils.
a) grep it is not in coreutils but in the grep package
b) you seem to have an allergy to essential packages (you know,
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:26]:
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:04:23PM]:
I think there is apt-history a better way.
For doing what exactly?
For doing this without corebutils.
a) grep it is not in coreutils but in the
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:12:24PM]:
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
sed, awk etc. but in my opinion this should be so easy as
possible to everyone. Not
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:44]:
#include hallo.h
* Nico Golde [Sat, Jul 09 2005, 01:12:24PM]:
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
sed, awk
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:22, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Hallo David,
* David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 13:20]:
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Hallo Matthew,
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
sed, awk etc.
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok it seems that I am the only one interrested in this
package. I will close the bug.
Thanks for your help!
Regards Nico
Please don't. Rather do what people suggested:
1.) adapt the script to use the dpkg.log
The dpkg log is overly detailed and probably
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
Hallo Matthew,
Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
advantage?
You can do almost every thing with
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I guess you would have to divert apt-get and aptitude for that and log
the invocations.
Actualy with aptitude taking the list of non automatic packages should
give you exactly the install list.
aptitude has had such kind
On Jul 09, 2005 at 19:36, Goswin von Brederlow praised the llamas by saying:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok it seems that I am the only one interrested in this
package. I will close the bug.
Thanks for your help!
Regards Nico
Please don't. Rather do what people suggested:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
* License : GPL
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
* License : GPL
Hallo Guillem,
* Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 01:52]:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
27 matches
Mail list logo
