On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:12:16PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:30 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > :
> > > Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching.
> > > AF_UNIX sockets must be created on
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:12:16PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:30 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> :
> > Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching.
> > AF_UNIX sockets must be created on a rw file system, and a symlink will
> > not work.
>
> On FreeBSD it work
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:30 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
:
> Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching.
> AF_UNIX sockets must be created on a rw file system, and a symlink will
> not work.
On FreeBSD it works. So I think it's possible.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sep 15, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should I do?
Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching.
AF_UNIX sockets must be created on a rw file system, and a symlink will
not work.
So either he uses udev, or in some way makes his own writeable /dev.
--
ciao,
Marco
Hi All (and sorry for my English)!
I have a bug about syslog-ng. This bug is a reincarnation of an already
closed bug, but I afraid, if I close this too, another incarnation will
be happened.
The problem is, that nor sysklogd nor syslog-ng could operate if
couldn't write to /dev. (They try to rem
5 matches
Mail list logo