Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Bart Martens] The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a replacement for flashplugin-nonfree. Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way you want it? I do not see the point of two installer packages for

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-23 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:39:00AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way you want it? I do not see the point of two installer packages for macromedia flash. Please limit it to just one,

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Alexander Sack] You mean take over the package? If that is required, yes. But I suspect a friendly reenforcement of the maintainer team is a better solution if one is able to get in touch with the maintainer. Have you ever succeeded to get any communication started with Takuo during the

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-23 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Lun 23 Janvier 2006 10:39, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : [Bart Martens] The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a replacement for flashplugin-nonfree. Why not just join forces with Takuo KITAME to maintain flashplugin-nonfree, and update it to behave the way

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-21 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: The Debian package flash-plugin is meant as an alternative or as a replacement for flashplugin-nonfree. Similarities: Both Debian packages are GPL, and download the .tar.gz from the Macromedia website to comply to the Macromedia

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 07:01 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: [snip] Well, but flashplugin-nonfree at least make the users feel how painful nonfree software are to deal with. Quite a usefule feature if you ask me! Is it, though, the

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-21 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:30:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 07:01 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: [snip] Well, but flashplugin-nonfree at least make the users feel how painful nonfree software are to deal

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 17:09 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote: On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:30:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 07:01 -0600, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: [snip] Well, but flashplugin-nonfree at least make

Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin

2006-01-20 Thread Bart Martens
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: flash-plugin Version : 7.0.61.1 Upstream Author : Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://members.chello.be/ws35943/flash-plugin/ * License : GPL Description :