David Weinehall wrote:
> > Upstream includes non-free manpages these days, so in reality, we have
> > already forked. Further Debian-specific changes are needed to address
> > bugs such as #295211 (upstream does not document our libc/kernel
> > combination).
>
> What manpages in upstream are non-
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:42:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * David Weinehall:
>
> >> Upstream includes non-free manpages these days, so in reality, we have
> >> already forked. Further Debian-specific changes are needed to address
> >> bugs such as #295211 (upstream does not document our l
* David Weinehall:
>> Upstream includes non-free manpages these days, so in reality, we have
>> already forked. Further Debian-specific changes are needed to address
>> bugs such as #295211 (upstream does not document our libc/kernel
>> combination).
>
> What manpages in upstream are non-free? D
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:26:57AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Russ Allbery:
>
> > Your points about sync(8) and tzselect(8) seem reasonable on the surface,
> > but the rest of this seems to be disregarding the fact that manpages and
> > manpages-dev are not native packages. Those man pages
* Russ Allbery:
> Your points about sync(8) and tzselect(8) seem reasonable on the surface,
> but the rest of this seems to be disregarding the fact that manpages and
> manpages-dev are not native packages. Those man pages are included in
> that package because they're maintained together upstrea
Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to change the topic, but looking at some of the manpages in the
> "manpages" package, and some of the pages in the "manpages-dev" causes
> me no notice some pages that look like they probably should be in a
> different package.
Your points about sync(
Sorry to change the topic, but looking at some of the manpages in the
"manpages" package,
and some of the pages in the "manpages-dev" causes me no notice some pages
that look like they probably should be in a different package.
ld-linux(8)
ld-linux.so(8)
These probably belong in libc6 which ap
7 matches
Mail list logo
