Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-13 Thread Tim Brown
On Monday 12 March 2007 18:25, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10956 March 1977, Tim Brown wrote: > > Why package it? Other than the practical uses outlined above, because > > having binaries on a system outside of the package management system is a > > PITA to keep track of / update and it makes buildi

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Florian Weimer
* Warren Turkal: > Educational reasons. I could see someone demonstrating breaking weak > passwords > with such a tool. But you already need root privileges to install the Debian package, which makes the whole thing not very convincing. Of course, it doesn't matter how you get hold of such a t

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Tim Brown wrote: >> Nope since he that did not go to d-d. Maybe you can outline professional >> uses in the description like done in the previous answers? > > As to previous answers, verbatim: > > I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing. (..) > companies using my

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10956 March 1977, Tim Brown wrote: > Why package it? Other than the practical uses outlined above, because having > binaries on a system outside of the package management system is a PITA to > keep track of / update and it makes building a new system very quick. Why do I need a package for

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/07 12:14, Tim Brown wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2007 17:06, you wrote: >>> * Package name: sucrack >>> Version : 1.1 >>> Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/ >>

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Tim Brown
> Nope since he that did not go to d-d. Maybe you can outline professional > uses in the description like done in the previous answers? As to previous answers, verbatim: I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing. There are already a number of people both internall

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Tim Brown
On Monday 12 March 2007 17:06, you wrote: > > * Package name: sucrack > > Version : 1.1 > > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : multithre

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Hendrik Sattler said: > Am Montag 12 März 2007 17:43 schrieb Warren Turkal: > > On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian? It's not an > > > administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag 12 März 2007 17:43 schrieb Warren Turkal: > On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian? > > It's not an administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security > > tests. I just can't see what the normal use of this too

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Kevin B. McCarty said: > > * Package name: sucrack > > Version : 1.1 > > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang: C > > Description :

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
> * Package name: sucrack > Version : 1.1 > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/ > * License : GPL > Programming Lang: C > Description : multithreaded su bruteforcer > > sucrack is a multithreaded Linu

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Martin Wuertele
* Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-12 17:44]: > On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian? > > It's not an administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security > > tests. I just can't see what the normal use of thi

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian? > It's not an administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security > tests. I just can't see what the normal use of this tool would be. Educational reasons. I could see someone demons

Re: Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag 12 März 2007 12:30 schrieb Tim Brown: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: sucrack > Version : 1.1 > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/ > * License

Bug#414534: ITP: sucrack -- multithreaded su bruteforcer

2007-03-12 Thread Tim Brown
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: sucrack Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : multithr