On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:14:06 +1000, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:11 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:19:59 +1000, Robert Collins
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > * rename the 'bazaar' package to 'baz' - both source and binary,
>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:38:43 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> bzr is an inplementation of Arch, and there are people who have not
>> bought the 'Bazaar VCS Project' koolaid, and still prefer Arch to the
>> new VCS.
> 'bzr' is not an im
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:11 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:19:59 +1000, Robert Collins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > * rename the 'bazaar' package to 'baz' - both source and binary,
> >though binary is the key one. This is because it is no longer the
> >reco
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:56 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:11:45 -0500]:
>
> > > * Create a 'bazaar' package which is a metapackage depending on bzr,
> > > recommending key plugins, and suggesting others.
>
> > This would be a bug. While I understa
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bzr is an inplementation of Arch, and there are people who have not
> bought the 'Bazaar VCS Project' koolaid, and still prefer Arch to
> the new VCS.
'bzr' is not an implementation of Arch. At best, it is strongly
inspired by work the developers
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:56:05 +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:11:45 -0500]:
>> > * Create a 'bazaar' package which is a metapackage depending on
>> >bzr,
>> > recommending key plugins, and suggesting others.
>> This would be a bug. Wh
On 17-Jul-07, 12:56 (CDT), Adeodato Sim?? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:11:45 -0500]:
>
> > > * Create a 'bazaar' package which is a metapackage depending on bzr,
> > > recommending key plugins, and suggesting others.
>
> > This would be a bug. Wh
* Manoj Srivastava [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:11:45 -0500]:
> > * Create a 'bazaar' package which is a metapackage depending on bzr,
> > recommending key plugins, and suggesting others.
> This would be a bug. While I understand you prefer the bzr VCS
> over Arch, I see no justification for i
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:19:59 +1000, Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * rename the 'bazaar' package to 'baz' - both source and binary,
>though binary is the key one. This is because it is no longer the
>recommended tool from the 'Bazaar VCS Project' rather it is
>deprecate
On 17-Jul-07, 05:19 (CDT), Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to do the following:
>
> * rename the 'bazaar' package to 'baz' - both source and binary, though
> binary is the key one. This is because it is no longer the recommended
> tool from the 'Bazaar VCS Project' rather
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 00:28 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I don't want to see a bzr-foo package in the archive for each .py module
> available on the internet which provides yet another sub-command for
> bzr. I asked under the (wrong) assumption that bzrtools was a Debian
> package shipping
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 00:28 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:48:14PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
> > > part of bzrtools?
> > Yes, it's a different upstream package.
> I was indeed too cryptic,
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since my assumption was wrong: what about creating a "bzr-addons"
> Debian package containing the most used bzr addons out there instead
> of filing an ITP for just one?
What about creating a 'bzr-addons' package that *depends* on those
package-per
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:48:14PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
> > part of bzrtools?
> Yes, it's a different upstream package.
I was indeed too cryptic, sorry, let me explain.
I don't want to see a bzr-foo package in the
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 17:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:11:09AM +0300, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > * Package name: bzr-rebase
> Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
> part of bzrtools?
Yes, it's a different upstream package.
Che
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:11:09AM +0300, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> * Package name: bzr-rebase
Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
part of bzrtools?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bonon
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bzr-rebase
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bazaar-vcs.org/Rebase
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
17 matches
Mail list logo
