On 8/20/07, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that the homepage of a software might change but I really think
> that the homepage changes much less frequently as the version of the
> package which makes the change of the homepage a managable issue in
> normal package maintainance
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
I suggest that the homepage does not belong inside the package at all
(because it can change separately to the package)
I agree that the homepage of a software might change but I really think
that the homepage changes much less frequently as the version of
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> as that was what was requested on 142324 and what has mostly been used
> on the pseudo-header in the Description field.
Wow!, that was fast, thanks!!
Can you
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:50:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There was some debate whether to use XBS-Homepage or XBS-Url. RPM uses
> URL: as the header. Other than that, I think most everyone considers it a
> good idea.
Agreed, except for the fact the XBS-Url is not meaningful as
XBS-Homepag
ma, 2007-08-20 kello 09:53 +1000, Paul Wise kirjoitti:
> I suggest that the homepage does not belong inside the package at all
> (because it can change separately to the package) and would be better
> off being maintained on packages.debian.org and merged into the
> Packages files similar to how de
On 8/20/07, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there's no technical obstacles in implementing this? Or rather, no
> reason for packages to not start using it now?
Does packages.debian.org show headers that it doesn't know about?
It seems that it doesn't:
http://packages.debian.org/u
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 10:50:00 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > su, 2007-08-19 kello 18:27 +0200, Christoph Berg kirjoitti:
> >> Please someone push forward the XB-Homepage: idea.
>
> > Does someone have a handy summary of where things stand with mo
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> su, 2007-08-19 kello 10:50 -0700, Russ Allbery kirjoitti:
>> There was some debate whether to use XBS-Homepage or XBS-Url. RPM uses
>> URL: as the header. Other than that, I think most everyone considers
>> it a good idea.
> So there's no technical o
su, 2007-08-19 kello 10:50 -0700, Russ Allbery kirjoitti:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > su, 2007-08-19 kello 18:27 +0200, Christoph Berg kirjoitti:
>
> >> Please someone push forward the XB-Homepage: idea.
>
> > Does someone have a handy summary of where things stand with movin
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> su, 2007-08-19 kello 18:27 +0200, Christoph Berg kirjoitti:
>> Please someone push forward the XB-Homepage: idea.
> Does someone have a handy summary of where things stand with moving
> homepage urls out from Description and into their own header?
The
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:27:28PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Please someone push forward the XB-Homepage: idea.
Uhm, no, please push XSB-Homepage (or XBS-Homepage, I don't know if both
are the same or not, hints on this are welcome).
If only on the binary package the PTS would have hard time
su, 2007-08-19 kello 18:27 +0200, Christoph Berg kirjoitti:
> Please someone push forward the XB-Homepage: idea.
Does someone have a handy summary of where things stand with moving
homepage urls out from Description and into their own header?
--
You need fewer comments, if you choose your names
tags 438712 + wontfix
thanks
Hi Christian,
Cc'ing -devel since I don't think there is a consensus about this
issue.
Re: Christian Perrier 2007-08-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This package's description mentions the upstream project web page. I suggest
> it uses the de facto standard of mentioning it
13 matches
Mail list logo
