On Jul 09, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would tend to disagree. 'single user mode' means 'the bare minimum for
> the system to work'; provided the system still has a static /dev if udev
> is not active (it does, right?), udev is not required at all for
> single user.
If the syste
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:56:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Actually, should udev be killed at all when switching to single user
> > mode?
>
> I don't think so. Single user mode is for sysadmin tasks and I'd say that
> the udev daemon should be running for those as perfor
On Jul 07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think so. Single user mode is for sysadmin tasks and I'd say that
> the udev daemon should be running for those as performing those tasks
> could result it udev triggers being generated, which should be processed.
What could I do then? /e
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Actually, should udev be killed at all when switching to single user
> mode?
I don't think so. Single user mode is for sysadmin tasks and I'd say that
the udev daemon should be running for those as performing those tasks
could result it udev triggers being generated, which
Actually, should udev be killed at all when switching to single user
mode?
Do we have a definition of how single user mode should work?
Obviously I am not looking forward to make the udev init script even
more complex.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
5 matches
Mail list logo
