[ If you reply please send CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:40:44PM +0100, Michael Schutte wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > I request an adopter for the "kbd" package.
>
> I’m interested in taking over, but I’m not a DD. I think it
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The transition from console-tools to kbd has been planned for years
> and the only reason of the delay is the chronic shortage of console
> maintainers in Debian. It seems Alastair supports only console-tools
> and for the rest it is only me and Chris
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:56:03AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Is there a reason to still keep kbd around?
Kbd has upstream maintainer, console-tools is dead. Because of this
Alastair McKinstry has already tagged several bugs as wontfix [*].
The transition from console-tools to kbd has been
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> [Please add me to your CC list.]
>
> I request an adopter for the "kbd" package.
>
> Actually it was never my intention to maintain "kbd", but its
> maintainer was the group "Console utilities
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
[Please add me to your CC list.]
I request an adopter for the "kbd" package.
Actually it was never my intention to maintain "kbd", but its
maintainer was the group "Console utilities maintainers" and it seems
currently I am the only member of this group... :)
Here
5 matches
Mail list logo
