Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-21 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: libactiverecord-ruby Version : 2.0.2 Upstream Author : David Heinemeier Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ar.rubyonra

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-21 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:19:01PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > * Package name: libactiverecord-ruby > Version : 2.0.2 > Upstream Auth

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-21 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:19:01PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > * Pac

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-24 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your > other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in > the archive is something the security team has said they are actively > discouraging. Split

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-24 Thread Adam Majer
Jon Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: >> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your >> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in >> the archive is something the security team has said they are activel

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-24 Thread Jeff W
On 24-Jan-08, at 9:37 AM, Adam Majer wrote: Jon Dowland wrote: On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in the archive is something th

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-25 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > Jon Dowland wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > >> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your > >> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in > >

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

2008-01-25 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > Why? What is the disadvantage of having it together with rails? I'm > assuming 7MB of diskspace (2MB archive) is not what is your main > reason. I'm interested in looking at active record in non-web situations. It's only a mild interest