Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libactiverecord-ruby
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : David Heinemeier Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ar.rubyonra
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:19:01PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> * Package name: libactiverecord-ruby
> Version : 2.0.2
> Upstream Auth
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:19:01PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > * Pac
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your
> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in
> the archive is something the security team has said they are actively
> discouraging. Split
Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your
>> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in
>> the archive is something the security team has said they are activel
On 24-Jan-08, at 9:37 AM, Adam Majer wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and
your
other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in
the archive is something th
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your
> >> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in
> >
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> Why? What is the disadvantage of having it together with rails? I'm
> assuming 7MB of diskspace (2MB archive) is not what is your main
> reason.
I'm interested in looking at active record in non-web situations. It's
only a mild interest
8 matches
Mail list logo