Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bastian Blank wrote:
(BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
for krb5.conf.5 so that krb5-doc and heimdal-doc don't need to conflict.
Prdon, this is missuse of that mechanism. man already can do that.
How?
Alternatives
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Using alternatives for kadmin is more problematic.
Which means that you need to find a consens and rename _both_ if none is
found.
(BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
for krb5.conf.5 so that
Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
users but is also quite often used by scripts.
Editors also can all work with text files. It's basically not true
that you can use a heimdal kadmin against an MIT
Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
users but is also quite often used by scripts.
[...]
Well, if alternatives is the wrong approach, let's try an analytical approach:
- heimdal-clients and
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Using alternatives for kadmin is more problematic.
Which means that you need to find a consens and rename _both_ if none is
found.
I certainly agree that's an even worse option.
--
Russ
Michael Tautschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, if alternatives is the wrong approach, let's try an analytical approach:
- heimdal-clients and krb5-user must not both be installed: Clearly,
conflicts: is indicated. Then both may provide kadmin. It will break
no system (they can't both
Hello,
Can I please have some input into this bug report?
The report itself seems valid, ideally these packages shouldn't conflict.
Solving this in such a way as not to break lots of stuff could be
awkward though.
Ideas?
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello,
Can I please have some input into this bug report?
The report itself seems valid, ideally these packages shouldn't conflict.
Solving this in such a way as not to break lots of stuff could be
awkward though.
Ideas?
Are you guys really sure that alternatives are so misplaced
Michael Tautschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I please have some input into this bug report?
The report itself seems valid, ideally these packages shouldn't conflict.
Solving this in such a way as not to break lots of stuff could be
awkward though.
Ideas?
Adding alternatives for
9 matches
Mail list logo
