Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-22 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:12:59AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: > The justification in the bug report is completely bogus. If the > clients did not shut down by the time the UPS master goes down then > you have bigger problems. Making the UPS daemon available for half a > second more does not make s

Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-21 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:56:16PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Does anybody see any downsides to this? If there are any pre-down/post-down commands in /etc/network/interfaces, then this can cause surprises. The same holds from custom scripts in /etc/network/{if-down.d,if-post-down.d}. The justi

Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-21 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 21, Teodor wrote: > This could be done by calling dhclient3 with "-r" parameter somehow, > but it isn't even required by the protocol. Is this an acceptable > workarround for the desktop computers? You need to discuss this with the dhcpd3 maintainer. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Descri

Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-21 Thread Kel Modderman
On Thursday 21 May 2009 01:56:16 Marco d'Itri wrote: > Does anybody see any downsides to this? > > - Forwarded message from Teodor - > > From: Teodor > To: Debian Bug Tracking System > Subject: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped

Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-21 Thread Teodor
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Not going to happen: releasing DHCP leases is more important. This could be done by calling dhclient3 with "-r" parameter somehow, but it isn't even required by the protocol. Is this an acceptable workarround for the desktop computers? Thank

Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-20 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 01:18 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <20090520155616.ga29...@bongo.bofh.it> you wrote: > > Does anybody see any downsides to this? > > It does not make sense to me. the network will be stopped after the daemon > if the daemon is confgured with correct depe

Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-20 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <20090520155616.ga29...@bongo.bofh.it> you wrote: > Does anybody see any downsides to this? It does not make sense to me. the network will be stopped after the daemon if the daemon is confgured with correct dependencies. And even if not, its a matter of seconds until the host shuts dow

Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
Does anybody see any downsides to this? - Forwarded message from Teodor - From: Teodor To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt Package: netbase Version: 4.34 Severity: important Tags: patch The current