Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: lazr.restfulclient
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.restfulclient
* License
Hi:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : lazr.restfulclient
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author :
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
version number. A casual listing from:
$ apt-cache search . | cut -d -f1 | grep \.
doesn't seem to turn anything up.
$ apt-cache -s=? search . |
Hi Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
version number. A casual listing from:
$ apt-cache search . | cut -d
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:38, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. Of note, however, is that those packages all begin with
python-. Maybe something like: python-lazr.restfulclient is more
appropriate?
Source packages names are different from binary packages names: did
you
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:31:37 -0400
Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
version number.
openoffice.org* is a long list of packages that contain a dot that is
not part of a version and then there are all the libraries
Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:38, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. Of note, however, is that those packages all begin with
python-. Maybe something like: python-lazr.restfulclient is more
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:31:37 -0400
Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
version number.
openoffice.org* is a long list of packages that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Yu schrieb:
Yep, that's what I meant by 'version part' -- though not part of the
actual package version, it does refer to a series (apache2.0 vs
apache2.2 for example) of packages. This, I consider to be distinct
from other packages like
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:53, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
In Perl at last,
packages are named like Package::Name, while the Debian packages are
called libpackage-name-perl. If the only justification for naming
Python modules that way is that it is more similar to the Python
.. Original Message ...
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:38:58 -0400 Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com
wrote:
Strange, I've never seen a
11 matches
Mail list logo
