On 18 November 2010 23:14, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:41:37AM +1100, dave b wrote:
>> So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug.
>> Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out!
>> I don't have time for that and you seem
Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>> Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
>> this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
> It happens to me with kdm.
Before or after you logged in to a session?
Is it reproducible for you by just restarting kdm wi
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:41:37AM +1100, dave b wrote:
> So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug.
> Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out!
> I don't have time for that and you seemed to know more!
Please calm down and don't shout at me. I'm no
This appears to be a duplicate of 596700.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1758119783.480227
So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug.
Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out!
I don't have time for that and you seemed to know more!
We so then the question is what happens if it is 'busy' and we attempt
to use it anyways ;) ?
--
To UNSUBS
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:01:53PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 17:15 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a
> écrit :
> > Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
> > this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 17:15 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a
écrit :
> Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
> this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
> does only show up with GDM. And it does never show up when starting GDM
> Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce
> this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue
> does only show up with GDM. And it does never show up when starting GDM
> the first time after boot, GDM needs to be stopped and started again for
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:36:14AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit :
> > After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even
> > after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected
> I noticed this happe
I am using gdm and not gdm3.
If you can give me more details as to why you think it is a kernel bug
that would be good ^ ^
(also the ordering of this bug report on the website rather weird...)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:36:14AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit :
> > After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even
> > after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected
> > behaviour.
>
> I
> I noticed this happens often to me too, and I can assure you it’s not a
> GDM bug. The Linux VT interface wrongly reports vt7 as being in use,
> before gdm is even started. It does not happen on all systems, so it
> might be related to KMS - for example it happens with my radeon-based
> system.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 603767 general
Bug #603767 [gdm] gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7
Bug reassigned from package 'gdm' to 'general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
603767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
reassign 603767 general
thanks
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit :
> After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even
> after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected
> behaviour.
I noticed this happens often to me too, and I ca
14 matches
Mail list logo
