On 08/09/2011 07:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I got fed up by people reporting bug on libc6, while this problem results
> from a decision Debian to implement multiarch. People should work on
> implementing a compatibility wrapper and to make upstream toolchain
> multiarch aware. Until this is don
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:48:23AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I am
>> tempted to reassign 629819 to general and merge the bugs.
[...]
> The bug is closed given we have provided some hints in NEWS.Debian.gz. I
> am not sure what reassigning this already closed bug woul
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:48:23AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > I got fed up by people reporting bug on libc6, while this problem results
> > from a decision Debian to implement multiarch. People should work on
> > implementing a compatibility wrapper and to make ups
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I got fed up by people reporting bug on libc6, while this problem results
> from a decision Debian to implement multiarch. People should work on
> implementing a compatibility wrapper and to make upstream toolchain
> multiarch aware. Until this is done, this bug should be k
Package: general
Severity: critical
Debian has choosen to implement multiarch, which amongs other things,
means that the includes and libraries are moved in a new "multiarch"
path. This breaks some upstream applications and non-Debian toolchain.
It is possible to workaround some of the issues as
5 matches
Mail list logo
