Re: Bug#690839: run-parts: By default the umask is set to 022

2012-11-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Clint Adams , 2012-11-11, 23:19: Yes, I'm aware of that. On the other hand: The current behavior seems insane to me, unless there would be a good reason for by default changing the umask to a less secure setting, but then that should be documented. I agree that the current run-parts behavio

Re: Bug#690839: run-parts: By default the umask is set to 022

2012-11-12 Thread Stefan Klinger
Hi, the attached patch against the 4.3.2 source [1] implements the solution I've sketched earlier. On 2012-Nov-11 23:19 (+), Clint Adams wrote with possible deletions: > > * For the next release, make run-parts issue a warning that it changes > > the umask, and that this behavior is goi

Re: Bug#690839: run-parts: By default the umask is set to 022

2012-11-11 Thread Clint Adams
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:35:46PM +0100, Stefan Klinger wrote: > Yes, I'm aware of that. On the other hand: The current behavior seems > insane to me, unless there would be a good reason for by default > changing the umask to a less secure setting, but then that should be > documented. > > I agr